Head of Engineering vs VP of Engineering: Key Differences Explained

Think “Head of Engineering” and “VP of Engineering” are just different ways of saying the same thing? They’re not. One role lives and breathes execution—roadmaps, sprints, and code quality. The other role is steering the company at 10,000 feet—budgets, scaling headcount, and aligning engineering with executive priorities.

Here’s the reality: you won’t thrive in both lanes equally. Some people are wired for tactical execution; others are wired for executive strategy. And if you’re choosing between these two career paths, you need to understand exactly what each one demands.

This is your honest, no-fluff playbook for understanding the differences, the overlaps, and which path might actually make you happier (and wealthier).

Honest Truth About Head of Engineering vs VP of Engineering Career Paths

Most engineers assume they’ll “climb the ladder” naturally from manager → head → VP. The truth? These are forks in the road, not just steps up the same staircase.

• Head of Engineering is closer to the team. You’re running engineering like a finely tuned machine—hiring, mentoring, keeping projects moving, and translating product needs into execution. You’re measured by delivery and quality.
• VP of Engineering is closer to the business. You’re responsible for the health and growth of the entire engineering organization. You’re measured by predictability, scalability, and how well engineering supports company strategy.

If you love building systems and being a “leader among engineers,” Head of Engineering may be your natural fit. If you love aligning with C-level peers, defending budgets, and thinking 18 months ahead, VP of Engineering is more your speed.

Companies with strong engineering leadership at both tactical and strategic levels are 33% more likely to hit product delivery goals on time compared to those without clear role separation.

Quick Comparison

Head of Engineering Overview

The Head of Engineering is the technical operator. You’re directly accountable for ensuring projects ship on time, systems scale, and engineers are happy and productive.

Key responsibilities include:

• Execution focus: Ensuring sprints run smoothly and deadlines are met without burning out the team.
• Hiring & coaching: Building a strong engineering team, mentoring managers, and supporting career growth for ICs. Heads of engineering curate and design the core interview process consisting of online assessments, phone screens, onsite rounds, and behavioral conversations.
• Technical alignment: Balancing engineering best practices with business demands.
• Team health: Spotting burnout, fixing process friction, and keeping morale high.

Think of this role as part technical coach, part operations manager. You’re less concerned with “how the company spends $100M” and more concerned with “how we get this release out the door without breaking production.”

Pro tip: Successful Heads of Engineering know how to shield the team from chaos coming from product or exec leadership. They create clarity and focus in an environment that would otherwise be messy.

VP of Engineering Overview

The VP of Engineering is an executive first, engineer second. You don’t live in the sprint board—you live in exec meetings. Your job is to ensure the entire engineering organization is structured, resourced, and aligned to deliver on company strategy.

Core responsibilities:

• Strategic planning: Working with the CTO and CEO to define the technical vision (6–24 months out).
• Budget ownership: Deciding how many engineers to hire, how much to spend on infrastructure, and how to allocate resources.
• Org design: Creating management layers, scaling from 30 → 100+ engineers, and ensuring communication flows.
• Executive communication: Representing engineering in board meetings, executive offsites, and cross-functional planning.
• Risk management: Identifying systemic risks (tech debt, under-staffing, hiring gaps) and addressing them before they blow up.

This role demands that you speak the language of finance, operations, and product, not just engineering. You’ll spend more time aligning with the CFO and COO than doing code reviews.

Pro tip: The most effective VPs know how to translate engineering to business outcomes. Instead of saying, “We need to refactor this API,” you’ll say, “We need to invest here so we can onboard enterprise customers without doubling support costs.”

What You Should Choose

Go with Head of Engineering:

If you thrive on being close to the technical action. This role keeps you hands-on with teams, mentoring engineers, guiding managers, and making sure projects move from concept to shipped software. You’ll spend much of your week in sprint reviews, code quality discussions, and problem-solving sessions, and you’ll get real satisfaction from seeing features go live and systems improve.

Day to day, you’ll spend much of your week in sprint reviews, design discussions, and problem-solving sessions, conducting performance reviews. The rewards are tangible: you’ll see features go live, systems improve, and people you mentor grow into stronger contributors. If you find energy in the craft itself and in guiding teams through the details, this role is where you’ll feel most at home.

Go with VP of Engineering:

If you want a seat at the executive table. It shifts focus away from execution and toward scaling the organization—overseeing budgets, shaping long-term strategy, and ensuring engineering aligns tightly with company-wide priorities. Success here depends less on technical depth and more on leadership range.

Your weeks will be filled with navigating politics, negotiating trade-offs, and influencing peers at the C-level. Instead of reviewing pull requests, you’ll be reviewing headcount plans and resource allocations. In this seat, designing org charts matters more than designing APIs, and your ability to drive alignment across the business determines your impact.

The Decision Checklist

• Pick Head of Engineering if:
  • You love being close to the technical action
  • You want to mentor engineers and managers
  • You’d rather spend your week in sprint reviews than board meetings
  • You get satisfaction from seeing software ship
• Pick VP of Engineering if:
  • You want a seat at the executive table
  • You’re energized by budgets, scaling, and long-term strategy
  • You’re comfortable with politics, negotiations, and influencing peers
  • You’d rather design org charts than design APIs

Neither is “better.” But choosing the wrong one can leave you frustrated and burned out.

The Money Talk

Let’s get real: compensation is a huge factor.

• Head of Engineering
  • Salary: $160K–$210K (US average, varies by region & company size)
  • Equity: Small to medium at startups, rarely meaningful at big companies
  • Bonus: Typically tied to delivery performance
  • Upside: More stability—your performance is measured by execution, which is more predictable
• VP of Engineering
  • Salary: $200K–$300K+ (large companies go higher)
  • Equity: Often significant, especially at growth-stage startups
  • Bonus: Tied to company performance, not just engineering
  • Upside: Higher earning potential, but also higher visibility and risk. If things go wrong, you’re the one held accountable.

To put this in perspective, consider a VP of Engineering at a Series C startup in the U.S. Their base salary might be $250K, but the real upside comes from equity—often 0.5%–1% of the company. If the startup exits or goes public, that equity could be worth millions, far exceeding what a Head of Engineering might earn even with a higher base. Meanwhile, the Head of Engineering in the same company might earn $180K with 0.3% equity, providing solid cash stability but a smaller potential windfall. This example highlights how equity transforms compensation for VPs, making the role higher risk but potentially much higher reward.

VPs of Engineering earn on average 30–40% more than Heads of Engineering, but the role also carries higher turnover risk, especially at Series B–C startups where board pressure is intense.

Bottom line: VPs make more, but they’re also more exposed. Heads of Engineering trade some upside for closer connection to the craft.

Typical Equity Terms and Figures to Expect

Equity is often the most misunderstood—and most lucrative—part of engineering leadership compensation. The percentage you receive depends heavily on company stage, size, and role.

• Head of Engineering: At early-stage startups (Seed–Series A), a Head of Engineering might receive 0.2%–0.8% equity, sometimes with a 4-year vesting schedule and a 1-year cliff. At larger companies, equity is typically smaller or symbolic, with stock refreshers offered annually. The goal here is alignment with long-term company success, but the upside is more modest compared to a VP.
• VP of Engineering: At growth-stage startups (Series B–C), a VP may receive 0.5%–2% equity, again typically vested over four years with a one-year cliff. At late-stage startups or pre-IPO companies, equity can range even higher, 1%–3%, with additional performance-based refreshers. Because the VP has a seat at the executive table, the equity package reflects the risk and responsibility of influencing company strategy and scaling the organization.

A real-world example: a VP at a Series C startup with 0.8% equity might see that stake grow from negligible value at the time of grant to millions of dollars if the company exits successfully, whereas a Head with 0.3% equity at the same company may see solid growth but a smaller windfall.

In short, equity for Heads of Engineering is a way to stay tied to company success while maintaining stable cash compensation, whereas for VPs, equity is a major lever for wealth creation—and a reflection of the higher risk and visibility inherent in the role.

How Do These Roles Compare Day-to-Day

The Day in the Life of Head of Engineering

9:00am to first meeting: The day for a Head of Engineering often starts by reviewing the sprint board and identifying any blockers that might be slowing down engineers. This is the time to catch up on overnight updates and ensure the team is set up for a productive day.

Midday: Around late morning to lunchtime, you’re typically meeting with product managers to refine feature scope, clarify requirements, and make sure engineering estimates align with business priorities. This period is all about translating strategy into actionable tasks for the team.

1:00pm to 4:00pm: The afternoon is usually reserved for interviews, mentoring, and problem-solving sessions. You might be interviewing candidates, coaching junior engineers, or pairing with tech leads on complex technical challenges. This is where your hands-on guidance directly shapes team performance. During interviews, assessing candidate skills against leetcode challenges is done by IC engineers, you screen holistically however. Often diving deep into their backgrounds and their experience at solving technical challenges.

4:30pm to 6:00pm: The day often wraps up with alignment meetings with leadership, reviewing delivery risks, and planning next steps. This is a time to ensure execution stays on track while keeping stakeholders informed. Overall, your calendar is team-oriented, making you a force multiplier for engineers.

Your calendar is full of team-oriented work—you’re a force multiplier for engineers.

Typical Day of a VP of Engineering

8:30am to 10:00am: The VP’s morning typically begins with executive syncs on quarterly priorities, aligning engineering objectives with broader company goals. This is more strategic than operational, setting the tone for the day.

10:30am to 1:00pm: Late morning to early afternoon is often devoted to reviewing budget forecasts, headcount planning, and resourcing decisions. The VP ensures that the org is properly staffed and equipped to hit long-term goals.

1:00pm to 4:00pm: The afternoon is filled with 1:1s with Directors or Heads of Engineering, coaching leadership, surfacing risks, and ensuring teams stay aligned. Here, the focus is on leadership leverage rather than individual execution.

4:30pm to 6:00pm: The day usually ends with preparing materials for board or executive updates, making high-level strategic decisions, and coordinating across departments. The VP’s calendar is company-oriented, multiplying impact through leadership rather than direct engineering work.

Your calendar is full of company-oriented work—you’re a force multiplier for leadership.

How to Setup Your Career Path for Each Role

Path to Head of Engineering

• Step 1: Excel as a Tech Lead or Engineering Manager (show you can deliver through others)
• Step 2: Demonstrate success leading multiple teams/projects
• Step 3: Build credibility as both a technical leader and people leader
• Step 4: Transition into Head role when org grows large enough to need it (typically ~20+ engineers)

VP Fast Track

• Step 1: Lead at the Director or Head level, proving you can scale teams effectively
• Step 2: Develop strong cross-functional relationships (especially with Product, Finance, and Ops)
• Step 3: Learn executive-level communication—focus on outcomes, not implementation details
• Step 4: Position yourself as someone who can scale an org from X → 10X (this is what CEOs look for)

Pro tip: VPs are rarely promoted for being the “best engineer.” They’re promoted for being the best organizational builder.

Conclusion

Head of Engineering vs VP of Engineering isn’t just semantics—it’s a choice about altitude.

• Head of Engineering keeps the engine running: focused on teams, projects, and delivery.
• VP of Engineering steers the ship: focused on budgets, strategy, and alignment.

Both roles are critical. Both pay well. But the path you choose should align with your natural strengths and energy.

At the end of the day: one role is about shipping products, the other is about scaling organizations. Success comes from knowing which one fuels you—and deliberately steering your career that way.

‍